aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/kernel')
-rw-r--r--lib/kernel/src/group.erl140
1 files changed, 133 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/lib/kernel/src/group.erl b/lib/kernel/src/group.erl
index 4d2e31a429..c66e823a04 100644
--- a/lib/kernel/src/group.erl
+++ b/lib/kernel/src/group.erl
@@ -515,6 +515,27 @@ get_line1({undefined,{_A,Mode,Char},Cs,Cont,Rs}, Drv, Ls0, Encoding)
Drv,
Ls, Encoding)
end;
+%% ^R = backward search, ^S = forward search.
+%% Search is tricky to implement and does a lot of back-and-forth
+%% work with edlin.erl (from stdlib). Edlin takes care of writing
+%% and handling lines and escape characters to get out of search,
+%% whereas this module does the actual searching and appending to lines.
+%% Erlang's shell wasn't exactly meant to traverse the wall between
+%% line and line stack, so we at least restrict it by introducing
+%% new modes: search, search_quit, search_found. These are added to
+%% the regular ones (none, meta_left_sq_bracket) and handle special
+%% cases of history search.
+get_line1({undefined,{_A,Mode,Char},Cs,Cont,Rs}, Drv, Ls, Encoding)
+ when ((Mode =:= none) and (Char =:= $\^R)) ->
+ send_drv_reqs(Drv, Rs),
+ %% drop current line, move to search mode. We store the current
+ %% prompt ('N>') and substitute it with the search prompt.
+ send_drv_reqs(Drv, edlin:erase_line(Cont)),
+ put(search_quit_prompt, edlin:prompt(Cont)),
+ Pbs = prompt_bytes("(search)`': ", Encoding),
+ {more_chars,Ncont,Nrs} = edlin:start(Pbs, search),
+ send_drv_reqs(Drv, Nrs),
+ get_line1(edlin:edit_line1(Cs, Ncont), Drv, Ls, Encoding);
get_line1({expand, Before, Cs0, Cont,Rs}, Drv, Ls0, Encoding) ->
send_drv_reqs(Drv, Rs),
ExpandFun = get(expand_fun),
@@ -535,8 +556,59 @@ get_line1({undefined,_Char,Cs,Cont,Rs}, Drv, Ls, Encoding) ->
send_drv_reqs(Drv, Rs),
send_drv(Drv, beep),
get_line1(edlin:edit_line(Cs, Cont), Drv, Ls, Encoding);
+%% The search item was found and accepted (new line entered on the exact
+%% result found)
+get_line1({_What,Cont={line,_Prompt,_Chars,search_found},Rs}, Drv, Ls0, Encoding) ->
+ Line = edlin:current_line(Cont),
+ %% this may create duplicate entries.
+ Ls = save_line(new_stack(get_lines(Ls0)), Line),
+ get_line1({done, Line, "", Rs}, Drv, Ls, Encoding);
+%% The search mode has been exited, but the user wants to remain in line
+%% editing mode wherever that was, but editing the search result.
+get_line1({What,Cont={line,_Prompt,_Chars,search_quit},Rs}, Drv, Ls, Encoding) ->
+ Line = edlin:current_chars(Cont),
+ %% Load back the old prompt with the correct line number.
+ case get(search_quit_prompt) of
+ undefined -> % should not happen. Fallback.
+ LsFallback = save_line(new_stack(get_lines(Ls)), Line),
+ get_line1({done, "\n", Line, Rs}, Drv, LsFallback, Encoding);
+ Prompt -> % redraw the line and keep going with the same stack position
+ NCont = {line,Prompt,{lists:reverse(Line),[]},none},
+ send_drv_reqs(Drv, Rs),
+ send_drv_reqs(Drv, edlin:erase_line(Cont)),
+ send_drv_reqs(Drv, edlin:redraw_line(NCont)),
+ get_line1({What, NCont ,[]}, Drv, pad_stack(Ls), Encoding)
+ end;
+%% Search mode is entered.
+get_line1({What,{line,Prompt,{RevCmd0,_Aft},search},Rs},
+ Drv, Ls0, Encoding) ->
+ send_drv_reqs(Drv, Rs),
+ %% Figure out search direction. ^S and ^R are returned through edlin
+ %% whenever we received a search while being already in search mode.
+ {Search, Ls1, RevCmd} = case RevCmd0 of
+ [$\^S|RevCmd1] ->
+ {fun search_down_stack/2, Ls0, RevCmd1};
+ [$\^R|RevCmd1] ->
+ {fun search_up_stack/2, Ls0, RevCmd1};
+ _ -> % new search, rewind stack for a proper search.
+ {fun search_up_stack/2, new_stack(get_lines(Ls0)), RevCmd0}
+ end,
+ Cmd = lists:reverse(RevCmd),
+ {Ls, NewStack} = case Search(Ls1, Cmd) of
+ {none, Ls2} ->
+ send_drv(Drv, beep),
+ {Ls2, {RevCmd, "': "}};
+ {Line, Ls2} -> % found. Complete the output edlin couldn't have done.
+ send_drv_reqs(Drv, [{put_chars, Encoding, Line}]),
+ {Ls2, {RevCmd, "': "++Line}}
+ end,
+ Cont = {line,Prompt,NewStack,search},
+ more_data(What, Cont, Drv, Ls, Encoding);
get_line1({What,Cont0,Rs}, Drv, Ls, Encoding) ->
send_drv_reqs(Drv, Rs),
+ more_data(What, Cont0, Drv, Ls, Encoding).
+
+more_data(What, Cont0, Drv, Ls, Encoding) ->
receive
{Drv,{data,Cs}} ->
get_line1(edlin:edit_line(Cs, Cont0), Drv, Ls, Encoding);
@@ -557,7 +629,6 @@ get_line1({What,Cont0,Rs}, Drv, Ls, Encoding) ->
get_line1(edlin:edit_line([], Cont0), Drv, Ls, Encoding)
end.
-
get_line_echo_off(Chars, Pbs, Drv) ->
send_drv_reqs(Drv, [{put_chars, unicode,Pbs}]),
get_line_echo_off1(edit_line(Chars,[]), Drv).
@@ -632,12 +703,46 @@ save_line({stack, U, {}, []}, Line) ->
save_line({stack, U, _L, D}, Line) ->
{stack, U, Line, D}.
-get_lines({stack, U, {}, []}) ->
+get_lines(Ls) -> get_all_lines(Ls).
+%get_lines({stack, U, {}, []}) ->
+% U;
+%get_lines({stack, U, {}, D}) ->
+% tl(lists:reverse(D, U));
+%get_lines({stack, U, L, D}) ->
+% get_lines({stack, U, {}, [L|D]}).
+
+%% There's a funny behaviour whenever the line stack doesn't have a "\n"
+%% at its end -- get_lines() seemed to work on the assumption it *will* be
+%% there, but the manipulations done with search history do not require it.
+%%
+%% It is an assumption because the function was built with either the full
+%% stack being on the 'Up' side (we're on the new line) where it isn't
+%% stripped. The only other case when it isn't on the 'Up' side is when
+%% someone has used the up/down arrows (or ^P and ^N) to navigate lines,
+%% in which case, a line with only a \n is stored at the end of the stack
+%% (the \n is returned by edlin:current_line/1).
+%%
+%% get_all_lines works the same as get_lines, but only strips the trailing
+%% character if it's a linebreak. Otherwise it's kept the same. This is
+%% because traversing the stack due to search history will *not* insert
+%% said empty line in the stack at the same time as other commands do,
+%% and thus it should not always be stripped unless we know a new line
+%% is the last entry.
+get_all_lines({stack, U, {}, []}) ->
U;
-get_lines({stack, U, {}, D}) ->
- tl(lists:reverse(D, U));
-get_lines({stack, U, L, D}) ->
- get_lines({stack, U, {}, [L|D]}).
+get_all_lines({stack, U, {}, D}) ->
+ case lists:reverse(D, U) of
+ ["\n"|Lines] -> Lines;
+ Lines -> Lines
+ end;
+get_all_lines({stack, U, L, D}) ->
+ get_all_lines({stack, U, {}, [L|D]}).
+
+%% For the same reason as above, though, we need to expand the stack
+%% in some cases to make sure we play nice with up/down arrows. We need
+%% to insert newlines, but not always.
+pad_stack({stack, U, L, D}) ->
+ {stack, U, L, D++["\n"]}.
save_line_buffer("\n", Lines) ->
save_line_buffer(Lines);
@@ -649,6 +754,27 @@ save_line_buffer(Line, Lines) ->
save_line_buffer(Lines) ->
put(line_buffer, Lines).
+search_up_stack(Stack, Substr) ->
+ case up_stack(Stack) of
+ {none,NewStack} -> {none,NewStack};
+ {L, NewStack} ->
+ case string:str(L, Substr) of
+ 0 -> search_up_stack(NewStack, Substr);
+ _ -> {string:strip(L,right,$\n), NewStack}
+ end
+ end.
+
+search_down_stack(Stack, Substr) ->
+ case down_stack(Stack) of
+ {none,NewStack} -> {none,NewStack};
+ {L, NewStack} ->
+ case string:str(L, Substr) of
+ 0 -> search_down_stack(NewStack, Substr);
+ _ -> {string:strip(L,right,$\n), NewStack}
+ end
+ end.
+
+
%% This is get_line without line editing (except for backspace) and
%% without echo.
get_password_line(Chars, Drv) ->
@@ -687,7 +813,7 @@ edit_password([$\177|Cs],[_|Chars]) ->%% is backspace enough?
edit_password([Char|Cs],Chars) ->
edit_password(Cs,[Char|Chars]).
-%% prompt_bytes(Prompt)
+%% prompt_bytes(Prompt, Encoding)
%% Return a flat list of characters for the Prompt.
prompt_bytes(Prompt, Encoding) ->
lists:flatten(io_lib:format_prompt(Prompt, Encoding)).