| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The test case loop.erl shows that there is a problem with certain
singleton key types. Here the internal representation toggles between
#{a | b => ...} and #{a => ..., b => ...}
The choice is to turn #{a | b => ...} into #{a => ..., b => ...} early
(t_from_form()). The aim is to keep as much info as possible (in
pairs). However, including complex singleton keys (tuples, maps) in
this scheme is potentially too costly, and a bit complicated. So one
more choice is made: let atoms and number (and nothing else) be
singleton types, and let complex keys go into the default key.
|
|
Suggested by Kostis.
|
|
Opaque singleton keys have the unfortunate property, unlike any other
singleton type, to overlap with other singleton types that do not have
the same internal representation. Therefore, we must not keep opaque
singletons in the Pairs list in a map type.
|
|
t_subtract/2 would break its postcondition by always returning the
underapproximation none() when given a variable on the right hand side.
This broke map type parsing, since it relied on t_subtract/2 to tell it
when map keys would shadow each other.
|
|
Opaque keys in maps broke an assumption in
erl_types:mapmerge_otherv/3 (that the infinimum of a singleton type and
some other type would either be none() or that same singleton type),
causing a case_clause crash.
|
